Chevrolet City Express vs Ford Transit Connect - Chevy City Express Forum
Reply
 
Thread Tools
post #1 of 33 Old 03-14-2014, 09:59 AM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Chevrolet City Express vs Ford Transit Connect

By far the biggest threat to the City Express' success is the continued dominance of Fords just updated Transit Connect. The TC is clearly the incumbant, having pretty much defined the segment in North America when it launched mid-2009.




Engines:

City Express: 2.0L DOHC I4
Transit Connect: 2.5L DOHC I4 or 1.6L EcoBoost I4

Power/Torque:

City Express: 131 @ 5200 rpm/139 @ 4800 rpm
Transit Connect: 169 @ 6000 rpm/171 @ 4500 rpm or 178 @ 5700 rpm/184 @ 2500 rpm

Fuel Economy (MPG):

City Express: 24 city/25 highway/24 combined
Transit Connect: 21 city/29 highway/24 combined (2.5L) or 22 city/30 highway/25 combined (1.6L T)

Max Payload/GVWR:

City Express: 1500 lbs/4751 lbs
Transit Connect: 1710 lbs/5280 lbs

Cargo Volume:

City Express: 122.7 cubic feet
Transit Connect: 126.4 cubic feet




Cabins:

City Express:



Transit Connect:



The City Express is really going to have a tough slog of conquering the volume race especially when it is seemingly outclassed in nearly every important metric. However the City Express does carry one silver bullet and that is its better fuel mileage in town, likely the result of Nissans CVT. Chevrolet has still not priced the City Express, but if they can undercut the Transit by a significant number coupled with its superior fuel economy and Chevrolet's brand it could steal more than a few sales.

Whats your take?
Ernest is offline  
post #2 of 33 Old 03-14-2014, 10:52 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 127
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
smaller engine gets better mileage in the city but worse mileage on the freeway

expected

the 2.0L in the express is a smalll engine
conquerer is offline  
post #3 of 33 Old 03-14-2014, 03:08 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 351
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by conquerer View Post
smaller engine gets better mileage in the city but worse mileage on the freeway

expected

the 2.0L in the express is a smalll engine
for that reason i think they should add a turbo, or turbo's. a sequential turbo setup should greatly help with power in all ranges and still keep fuel economy in the low range



bowtie is offline  
 
post #4 of 33 Old 03-14-2014, 04:48 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 137
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 45 Post(s)
It looks like the Transit Connect beats out the City Express on most measures. Is the price similar on both of them? I think that once a vehicle becomes the standard, it becomes really hard to dethrone unless you truly hit it out of the park. I'm pretty sure that Chevy hasn't done that here.



Holla is offline  
post #5 of 33 Old 03-16-2014, 02:26 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
well the nv200 is cheaper than the transit, some say its the dealer network that holds the back. so what branding and availability plus price will make it a winner...
Ernest is offline  
post #6 of 33 Old 03-17-2014, 02:10 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 351
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Cheaper pricing does help to pull in more people, as people buying these want to spend as little as they can



bowtie is offline  
post #7 of 33 Old 03-24-2014, 06:00 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
I think whats going to hammer chevy in the sales race is that Ford is now offering the Transit to north american consumers in passenger van form. I actually saw one just the other day, its a very modern iteration of the mini van, but not in the foolish japanese sense of body kits and hood scoops. Its classy.

I wonder if chev will be considering a passenger version?
Ernest is offline  
post #8 of 33 Old 03-25-2014, 04:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 351
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
At least it can't be as bad as japanese vans like this:





bowtie is offline  
post #9 of 33 Old 03-25-2014, 05:14 PM Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 134
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18 Post(s)
Quote:
Originally Posted by bowtie View Post
At least it can't be as bad as japanese vans like this:

hehh, yea but this is almost as bad...



I think the TC wagon is a great little modern mini van, it looks a bit stretched as well vs the straight panel version..




I would imagine chev could base a passenger version off the NV200 taxi special...
Ernest is offline  
post #10 of 33 Old 03-25-2014, 05:18 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 127
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 34 Post(s)
i guess its a good thing the inside is painted too. i never noticed this.. as my previous van was white. not entirely sure if the inside was painted.. i dont even remember
conquerer is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the Chevy City Express Forum forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in










User Tag List

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



  Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
City Express vs Transit Connect: Interiors Ernest 2014+ City Express General Discussion Forum 5 02-21-2014 04:26 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off